A Supreme Court justice is not supposed to support one platform over another before presiding over a case. And though life is supposed to advance forward, the opposite is currently taking place concerning voting rights.
Recently, much has been processing through change not necessarily for the better since Ruth Bader Ginsberg was appointed to the Supreme Court in 1993 …
Too many of our countrymen continue to believe The Big Lie concerning the fraudulence of votes counted mechanically for Biden while remaining unconcerned about the legitimacy of votes counted for trump—within the same machines—this discrepancy verifies the fact that arguments based in emotional reactiveness offer up not a word based in logical thought processing suggestive of why change is not necessarily synonymous with progress, most especially when the topic of discussion concerns the eruption of flagrant inconsistencies arising quite often within the political arena, where very little in the way of positively focused improvement actually takes place.
Will and I binged on The West Wing and as much as we enjoyed the series, frustration arose upon our acknowledgment of political rhetoric within the US governing body of 25 years ago matching political rhetoric spun, today, providing us with this deeper truth, yet again: Whether or not integrity assumes the presidential seat of power, political progress of a lasting nature that benefits most of the people is always hard to gain and then maintain. Amen.
Annie👩🏻 🇺🇸
No comments:
Post a Comment